Logarithmic and Exponential Functions · 0606 Topic 6
Reducing Relationships to Linear Form
Written by Teacher Rig
8 years teaching IGCSE Add Math · Updated 12 June 2026
Experimental data following or plots as a curve, useless for reading off constants. Taking logs straightens it, and the constants reappear as gradient and intercept. This is one of 0606’s most predictable multi-mark questions, with a fixed three-step script.
The two standard reductions
Power model : take logs of both sides:
Match to : plot against gradient , intercept
Exponential model :
Plot against gradient , intercept
The diagnostic: a power model logs both variables; an exponential model logs only . ( works identically, with , plot against ; gradient , intercept .)
The three-step script
- Take logs and rearrange into straight-line form, show the log laws applied (M)
- State the matching: “plotting against gives a straight line with gradient and intercept ” (M/B, the statement itself scores)
- Extract the constants from the given/measured gradient and intercept
Step 3 hides the most-dropped mark in the subtopic: the intercept gives , not . If the intercept is , then . Undo the log; don’t transcribe it.
Working from a given graph or table
Given a drawn line of against : gradient from two well-separated points ; intercept (or substitution of one point) . Given raw data: log the appropriate columns first, then fit. Either way, finish by writing the model with numbers in: , the assembled equation is usually the final A mark.
Common mistakes
- Constants left as logs ( instead of )
- The wrong variable logged for the model (both for power, only for exponential)
- Matching statement skipped, constants pulled from nowhere score thinly
- lg/ln mixed mid-question (pick one and stay)
- Gradient read from adjacent, near-identical points (use the line’s full span)
This is the same linearising idea as the non-log conversions in straight-line graphs, one skill, two topics. Full topic context: Logs & Exponentials notes.