Straight-Line Graphs · 0606 Topic 7
Converting to Linear Form
Written by Teacher Rig
8 years teaching IGCSE Add Math · Updated 12 June 2026
A relationship like doesn’t plot straight against , but it plots perfectly straight against . Converting to linear form means choosing new axes so the model becomes , reading and from the line, and translating back to the original constants.
The matching method
Force the relationship into “(something) = constant (something else) + constant”:
| Model | Plot against | Gradient | Intercept |
|---|---|---|---|
| vs | |||
| vs | |||
| vs | |||
| vs | |||
| vs |
The technique: divide, multiply or substitute until each variable appears in exactly one compound, then say what’s plotted against what. That statement. “plotting against gives a straight line with gradient and intercept ”, is itself a mark.
Data follows . Linearise. Multiply by : plot against ; gradient , intercept .
Recovering the constants
From the drawn line (or a given gradient/intercept): compute the gradient from two well-separated points on the line, read the intercept, and translate back. Two cautions: the intercept must be read where (which is , not necessarily the left edge of the printed graph), and any compound like or must be undone when reporting, finish by writing the original model with numbers: . The log-based versions (, ) follow the same script with an extra unlog step, covered here.
Given data tables, build the transformed columns (, , …) first, exactly, these feed the gradient, and transcription slips propagate.
Common mistakes
- Plot variables chosen so a variable appears on both axes in solvable form (no valid match shown)
- Intercept read at the graph’s left edge instead of
- Compound variables never undone ( reported as )
- Gradient from two adjacent points instead of the line’s span
- The final model never assembled with its numerical constants
Full topic context: Straight-Line Graphs notes · the log version: reducing to linear form.